Tuesday, June 30, 2009
MY RESEARCH TOPIC
SAVING GREEN MANEUVER CARBON is for me a very technical research. It has to do with hardware. Well I can't discuss everything now but i have the assurance that i can do it right:)
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
assignment 1
Last enrollment, all was surprise to the new tread of the enrollment. The University of Southeastern Philippines is having a new enrollment system. It maybe a shock to everybody but yes, it’s true. The reasons behind this are maybe known to anyone unknown to everyone.
In my opinion, I think the reasons why the university changed the enrollment system into a tapped in – house resources are: first, the old enrollment system was pretty expensive. The university has to pay (I think if I’m not mistaken) monthly (or yearly?) for the programmer to maintain the enrollment system. I don’t know how much that cost but according to some hear says that it was really costly and in practical manner, the University (for me) cannot hold on into a system that is too expensive. Second, I think they changed the system because if some inputs are incorrect or there’s something problem about the system, the university don’t have to look and pay for the programmer who maintains it to correct the error/problem. As from what I had learned/heard in the discussions, the programmer who can only touch/maintain a system is the one who made it (I guess it’s because of m***y or maybe something else? hehehehe). Third, I guess it will also boost up the image of the university having in-house resources made by its faculty and maybe staff. I maybe don’t have knowledge on other schools for also having in-house resources but I guess it’s still a point for the university. Fourth, I think for them to be able to save money. As what I have heard on news, the government cannot produce or sustain all the needs of the government schools and if they can it takes a lot of time to provide the needs of these schools. That’s why in high school, there’s an org for parents which helps the school to provide a good ambiance of learning to the students. And I guess that is also the reason of the university. Fifth, I presume that the university wants a good start of a new learning and facilities to the student and this is a good beginning. As of now, there’s a lot of project that the university is currently working on and I firmly believe that it’s for the good of the students and for the university also. Lastly, I think that having in-house resources will credit to the faculties who made this not only for the faculties but also to the school. It will show that the university is not just a university but it’s also a university for the finest instructors.
For me, the in-house resource for the university is a good decision. A long time ago, there are a lot of students in our course (having the subjects of Software Engineering and Systems Analysis and Design) that are always proposing on an enrollment system. I don’t know what there motive is but I think in the back of their mind, they are not satisfied in the enrollment system of the school that’s why they always proposing the same thing. And now, the new system for enrollment is built I guess there will be no student who will propose again for the same thing well that’s unless they’re not satisfied about it. Going back to in-house resources, I really think that it’s a good decision as I have said a while ago. It’s because it means that the university is starting to work for changes, it’s an alteration for a new academe and it will also mean that they want to give not just good but best facilities to the students and that’s what they currently working on.
I also think that it will also show that the university is having best instructors that would satisfy the student’s crave of learning, just imagine that their own instructor can do an incredible work for the university what more to the students? Others will give an idea about how the instructors can give knowledge to the students and how standard the university is. This would mean that the university is indeed a great school and no one will question about that.
When there’s something wrong about the system, the university will not have a hard time looking for the programmer who made it. It is because the programmer itself is very accessible enough since the programmer is only within the reach of the university because the programmer who made this is also an instructor in the university. They might pay for the service fee but at least it’s within the reach (and maybe the price is not too high because maybe it’s discounted? Hehehe I’m not so sure).
Aside from it, I think that it is been proposed along time ago it’s just that there’s no budget for it and the university is looking for some pros and cons about it. And they were thinking what will be the possibilities to implement it while they are still having other a lot of projects. But whatever it is, they still manage to have a new enrolment system.
It is indeed made the students proud of their instructors for having it built. It can also boost up the university’s image. Other’s will really see that even though the university is lack of facilities for the students but still they trying their best to show that they can still provide the needs of the students aside from the fact that they are lacking some facilities. It will show that facilities itself is not enough to produce good students but the learning itself the university provide is also a plus. Having the system will really show what kind of instructor the university has and what kind of students will produce because of these instructors.
But whatever the reason is I know it’s for the benefit of the students, instructors and for the university itself. It is for the good of both parties. I think that is all I have got in my mind.
In my opinion, I think the reasons why the university changed the enrollment system into a tapped in – house resources are: first, the old enrollment system was pretty expensive. The university has to pay (I think if I’m not mistaken) monthly (or yearly?) for the programmer to maintain the enrollment system. I don’t know how much that cost but according to some hear says that it was really costly and in practical manner, the University (for me) cannot hold on into a system that is too expensive. Second, I think they changed the system because if some inputs are incorrect or there’s something problem about the system, the university don’t have to look and pay for the programmer who maintains it to correct the error/problem. As from what I had learned/heard in the discussions, the programmer who can only touch/maintain a system is the one who made it (I guess it’s because of m***y or maybe something else? hehehehe). Third, I guess it will also boost up the image of the university having in-house resources made by its faculty and maybe staff. I maybe don’t have knowledge on other schools for also having in-house resources but I guess it’s still a point for the university. Fourth, I think for them to be able to save money. As what I have heard on news, the government cannot produce or sustain all the needs of the government schools and if they can it takes a lot of time to provide the needs of these schools. That’s why in high school, there’s an org for parents which helps the school to provide a good ambiance of learning to the students. And I guess that is also the reason of the university. Fifth, I presume that the university wants a good start of a new learning and facilities to the student and this is a good beginning. As of now, there’s a lot of project that the university is currently working on and I firmly believe that it’s for the good of the students and for the university also. Lastly, I think that having in-house resources will credit to the faculties who made this not only for the faculties but also to the school. It will show that the university is not just a university but it’s also a university for the finest instructors.
For me, the in-house resource for the university is a good decision. A long time ago, there are a lot of students in our course (having the subjects of Software Engineering and Systems Analysis and Design) that are always proposing on an enrollment system. I don’t know what there motive is but I think in the back of their mind, they are not satisfied in the enrollment system of the school that’s why they always proposing the same thing. And now, the new system for enrollment is built I guess there will be no student who will propose again for the same thing well that’s unless they’re not satisfied about it. Going back to in-house resources, I really think that it’s a good decision as I have said a while ago. It’s because it means that the university is starting to work for changes, it’s an alteration for a new academe and it will also mean that they want to give not just good but best facilities to the students and that’s what they currently working on.
I also think that it will also show that the university is having best instructors that would satisfy the student’s crave of learning, just imagine that their own instructor can do an incredible work for the university what more to the students? Others will give an idea about how the instructors can give knowledge to the students and how standard the university is. This would mean that the university is indeed a great school and no one will question about that.
When there’s something wrong about the system, the university will not have a hard time looking for the programmer who made it. It is because the programmer itself is very accessible enough since the programmer is only within the reach of the university because the programmer who made this is also an instructor in the university. They might pay for the service fee but at least it’s within the reach (and maybe the price is not too high because maybe it’s discounted? Hehehe I’m not so sure).
Aside from it, I think that it is been proposed along time ago it’s just that there’s no budget for it and the university is looking for some pros and cons about it. And they were thinking what will be the possibilities to implement it while they are still having other a lot of projects. But whatever it is, they still manage to have a new enrolment system.
It is indeed made the students proud of their instructors for having it built. It can also boost up the university’s image. Other’s will really see that even though the university is lack of facilities for the students but still they trying their best to show that they can still provide the needs of the students aside from the fact that they are lacking some facilities. It will show that facilities itself is not enough to produce good students but the learning itself the university provide is also a plus. Having the system will really show what kind of instructor the university has and what kind of students will produce because of these instructors.
But whatever the reason is I know it’s for the benefit of the students, instructors and for the university itself. It is for the good of both parties. I think that is all I have got in my mind.
assignment 1
Last enrollment, all was surprise to the new tread of the enrollment. The University of Southeastern Philippines is having a new enrollment system. It maybe a shock to everybody but yes, it’s true. The reasons behind this are maybe known to anyone unknown to everyone.
In my opinion, I think the reasons why the university changed the enrollment system into a tapped in – house resources are: first, the old enrollment system was pretty expensive. The university has to pay (I think if I’m not mistaken) monthly (or yearly?) for the programmer to maintain the enrollment system. I don’t know how much that cost but according to some hear says that it was really costly and in practical manner, the University (for me) cannot hold on into a system that is too expensive. Second, I think they changed the system because if some inputs are incorrect or there’s something problem about the system, the university don’t have to look and pay for the programmer who maintains it to correct the error/problem. As from what I had learned/heard in the discussions, the programmer who can only touch/maintain a system is the one who made it (I guess it’s because of m***y or maybe something else? hehehehe). Third, I guess it will also boost up the image of the university having in-house resources made by its faculty and maybe staff. I maybe don’t have knowledge on other schools for also having in-house resources but I guess it’s still a point for the university. Fourth, I think for them to be able to save money. As what I have heard on news, the government cannot produce or sustain all the needs of the government schools and if they can it takes a lot of time to provide the needs of these schools. That’s why in high school, there’s an org for parents which helps the school to provide a good ambiance of learning to the students. And I guess that is also the reason of the university. Fifth, I presume that the university wants a good start of a new learning and facilities to the student and this is a good beginning. As of now, there’s a lot of project that the university is currently working on and I firmly believe that it’s for the good of the students and for the university also. Lastly, I think that having in-house resources will credit to the faculties who made this not only for the faculties but also to the school. It will show that the university is not just a university but it’s also a university for the finest instructors.
For me, the in-house resource for the university is a good decision. A long time ago, there are a lot of students in our course (having the subjects of Software Engineering and Systems Analysis and Design) that are always proposing on an enrollment system. I don’t know what there motive is but I think in the back of their mind, they are not satisfied in the enrollment system of the school that’s why they always proposing the same thing. And now, the new system for enrollment is built I guess there will be no student who will propose again for the same thing well that’s unless they’re not satisfied about it. Going back to in-house resources, I really think that it’s a good decision as I have said a while ago. It’s because it means that the university is starting to work for changes, it’s an alteration for a new academe and it will also mean that they want to give not just good but best facilities to the students and that’s what they currently working on.
I also think that it will also show that the university is having best instructors that would satisfy the student’s crave of learning, just imagine that their own instructor can do an incredible work for the university what more to the students? Others will give an idea about how the instructors can give knowledge to the students and how standard the university is. This would mean that the university is indeed a great school and no one will question about that.
When there’s something wrong about the system, the university will not have a hard time looking for the programmer who made it. It is because the programmer itself is very accessible enough since the programmer is only within the reach of the university because the programmer who made this is also an instructor in the university. They might pay for the service fee but at least it’s within the reach (and maybe the price is not too high because maybe it’s discounted? Hehehe I’m not so sure).
Aside from it, I think that it is been proposed along time ago it’s just that there’s no budget for it and the university is looking for some pros and cons about it. And they were thinking what will be the possibilities to implement it while they are still having other a lot of projects. But whatever it is, they still manage to have a new enrolment system.
It is indeed made the students proud of their instructors for having it built. It can also boost up the university’s image. Other’s will really see that even though the university is lack of facilities for the students but still they trying their best to show that they can still provide the needs of the students aside from the fact that they are lacking some facilities. It will show that facilities itself is not enough to produce good students but the learning itself the university provide is also a plus. Having the system will really show what kind of instructor the university has and what kind of students will produce because of these instructors.
But whatever the reason is I know it’s for the benefit of the students, instructors and for the university itself. It is for the good of both parties. I think that is all I have got in my mind.
In my opinion, I think the reasons why the university changed the enrollment system into a tapped in – house resources are: first, the old enrollment system was pretty expensive. The university has to pay (I think if I’m not mistaken) monthly (or yearly?) for the programmer to maintain the enrollment system. I don’t know how much that cost but according to some hear says that it was really costly and in practical manner, the University (for me) cannot hold on into a system that is too expensive. Second, I think they changed the system because if some inputs are incorrect or there’s something problem about the system, the university don’t have to look and pay for the programmer who maintains it to correct the error/problem. As from what I had learned/heard in the discussions, the programmer who can only touch/maintain a system is the one who made it (I guess it’s because of m***y or maybe something else? hehehehe). Third, I guess it will also boost up the image of the university having in-house resources made by its faculty and maybe staff. I maybe don’t have knowledge on other schools for also having in-house resources but I guess it’s still a point for the university. Fourth, I think for them to be able to save money. As what I have heard on news, the government cannot produce or sustain all the needs of the government schools and if they can it takes a lot of time to provide the needs of these schools. That’s why in high school, there’s an org for parents which helps the school to provide a good ambiance of learning to the students. And I guess that is also the reason of the university. Fifth, I presume that the university wants a good start of a new learning and facilities to the student and this is a good beginning. As of now, there’s a lot of project that the university is currently working on and I firmly believe that it’s for the good of the students and for the university also. Lastly, I think that having in-house resources will credit to the faculties who made this not only for the faculties but also to the school. It will show that the university is not just a university but it’s also a university for the finest instructors.
For me, the in-house resource for the university is a good decision. A long time ago, there are a lot of students in our course (having the subjects of Software Engineering and Systems Analysis and Design) that are always proposing on an enrollment system. I don’t know what there motive is but I think in the back of their mind, they are not satisfied in the enrollment system of the school that’s why they always proposing the same thing. And now, the new system for enrollment is built I guess there will be no student who will propose again for the same thing well that’s unless they’re not satisfied about it. Going back to in-house resources, I really think that it’s a good decision as I have said a while ago. It’s because it means that the university is starting to work for changes, it’s an alteration for a new academe and it will also mean that they want to give not just good but best facilities to the students and that’s what they currently working on.
I also think that it will also show that the university is having best instructors that would satisfy the student’s crave of learning, just imagine that their own instructor can do an incredible work for the university what more to the students? Others will give an idea about how the instructors can give knowledge to the students and how standard the university is. This would mean that the university is indeed a great school and no one will question about that.
When there’s something wrong about the system, the university will not have a hard time looking for the programmer who made it. It is because the programmer itself is very accessible enough since the programmer is only within the reach of the university because the programmer who made this is also an instructor in the university. They might pay for the service fee but at least it’s within the reach (and maybe the price is not too high because maybe it’s discounted? Hehehe I’m not so sure).
Aside from it, I think that it is been proposed along time ago it’s just that there’s no budget for it and the university is looking for some pros and cons about it. And they were thinking what will be the possibilities to implement it while they are still having other a lot of projects. But whatever it is, they still manage to have a new enrolment system.
It is indeed made the students proud of their instructors for having it built. It can also boost up the university’s image. Other’s will really see that even though the university is lack of facilities for the students but still they trying their best to show that they can still provide the needs of the students aside from the fact that they are lacking some facilities. It will show that facilities itself is not enough to produce good students but the learning itself the university provide is also a plus. Having the system will really show what kind of instructor the university has and what kind of students will produce because of these instructors.
But whatever the reason is I know it’s for the benefit of the students, instructors and for the university itself. It is for the good of both parties. I think that is all I have got in my mind.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)